Definition
The distinction between consenting to enter a dependency and consenting to every degree of dependency its operation produces. Adoption is one choice, made once, under one set of alternatives; depth is what accumulates afterwards without any further choice being offered.
The choice at adoption helps manufacture the constrained choice set later. Data accumulates, collaborators organise around the system, alternatives disappear, and the adopter's own competence atrophies, so “you chose this” stops describing the present relationship. Enumerating affected parties at adoption does not close the set either, because people become exposed later without ever having been asked. Bound by STD-02 §10.1 and §10.2.
It matters because standing is usually rationed by original consent. Depth is why corrective standing has to reach anyone who became an error-bearing party after adoption, and why a deepened dependency is where exit coercion operates with nobody applying pressure, leaving a right of exit that is formally intact and practically spent.
Scale: Organizational · Phases: Deployment, Audit · Measurability: Semi-quantitative · Maturity: Active research
Adjacent terms
References
- STD-02 contestability and recourse · Standard
- Standing eval · Eval