Brittleness as default
Services ship without refusal pathways, redundancy, or trauma-aware operations, so minor shocks cascade into incidents.
It synthesizes design research, operations science, and community accountability to keep refusal, reversibility, and care resourced.
Ethotechnics names the intellectual commitments, canonical problems, and diagnostic rituals that surface when frontline fatigue meets brittle infrastructure. As a field, it offers a conceptual synthesis: identify maintenance debt early, redistribute responsibility, and build governance that can absorb shock.
The field packages what practitioners learn into problems, playbooks, and predictive drills that keep care visible.
Ethotechnics formalizes lessons from mutual aid, community health, civic technology, and responsible AI into a field that maps maintenance debt and names what accountability requires.
Organizers, technologists, and healers compared notes on the invisible labor propping up brittle systems.
We recorded recurring patterns of brittleness, overload, and collapse to make early detection and refusal possible.
The field now includes diagnostic playbooks, glossaries, and practice notes others can extend across sectors.
Ethotechnics catalogs canonical problems that show up when infrastructure leans on unfunded maintenance and brittle governance. These problems surface patterns the field can diagnose early and redesign against.
Services ship without refusal pathways, redundancy, or trauma-aware operations, so minor shocks cascade into incidents.
Stewards are asked to mask structural decay with heroics, absorbing hidden load without rest, debriefs, or power to redirect work.
When maintainers leave, knowledge, care, and safeguards leave with them—exposing how accountability was personal, not structural.
Ethotechnics turns these problems into diagnostics, patterns, and rituals that keep care resourced.
Ethotechnics is stewarded as a field of study and practice. The studio operationalizes these commitments through diagnostics, rituals, and prototypes. Learn about the steward guiding the field and the commitments that shape every inquiry.
Field steward & principal investigator
Kanav convenes Ethotechnics as a field after years guiding public-interest digital service teams through crisis response, reliability remediation, and governance redesign. He co-authored the research agenda, stewards the glossary of canonical problems, and facilitates maintenance readiness labs; see his professional profile.
We convene designers, technologists, organizers, healers, and policymakers to keep the field accountable to lived maintenance work.
The field invites collaborators—from trauma-informed facilitators to policy strategists—when a canonical problem demands broader expertise.
We document diagnostic findings with consent so communities benefit from the stories that shape the field.
Patterns from scaling Doximity Dialer turned into refusal pathways, runbooks, and risk signals within the field.
Hospital integrations revealed canonical problems around reversibility and handoffs, now formalized within Ethotechnics.
Cross-functional review rituals became templates for accountability architectures other teams can adopt.
The studio operationalizes the field with healthcare platforms, civic tech coalitions, and AI labs to pilot maintenance rituals and accountability frameworks.
Read the foundational essays on syadvada.com to trace how Ethotechnics synthesizes diagnostics, rituals, and governance.
“Ethotechnics rebuilt our readiness drills so clinicians, compliance, and ops share the same playbook for maintenance.”
“Maintenance labs gave our civic network language to name hidden labor, budget for repair, and argue for refusal.”
“Their frameworks shape how our AI lab builds human review loops and accountability architectures each sprint.”
Ethotechnics exists because systems often rely on invisible labor. We choose to build infrastructures where rest, refusal, and repair are built-in.
We refuse framings that turn maintenance into branding exercises or siloed audits. If you need quick optics, we're not the right fit.
We don't sell checklist trainings—we co-design accountability with the stewards already carrying maintenance debt.
There are no brainstorm pageants here. We focus on predictive drills, not novelty for its own sake.
We won't launder harm through thin audits. Safeguards stay grounded in lived risk, not paperwork alone.
We partner where refusal and reversibility are on the table, not to polish narratives around fragile systems.
Tell us about the systems you support. We’ll follow up with collaboration options, upcoming labs, and relevant resources.
Receive practice notes, workshop invites, and stories from the field.