STANDARD STD-02
Contestability & Recourse
Article I: The Right to Notice & Reasons
“No decision shall be final without specific, actionable reasons.”
§1.1 Decision Objects: Every automated decision must produce a decision object containing reason codes, evidence sources, and scope boundaries.
§1.2 Plain Language: Reasons must be written in language a layperson can understand. Legalese and internal codes are insufficient.
§1.3 Immediate Availability: Reasons must be available at the moment of decision. Deferred explanation is not compliance.
Article II: The Right to an Appeal Path
“The decision surface must include the appeal entry point.”
§2.1 Accessible Intake: The appeal path must be reachable directly from the decision notification or interface.
§2.2 Named Authority: The appeal path must identify the accountable authority with reversal power.
§2.3 Binding Deadlines: Appeal deadlines must be published, time-bound, and enforced.
Article III: The Right to a Review Clock
“Unbounded review is a governance failure.”
§3.1 Declared Maximum: Every review process must declare a maximum duration.
§3.2 Auto-Escalation: When the clock expires without resolution, the case must auto-escalate to a higher authority or default to reversal.
§3.3 Interim Protections: While review is pending, the affected party must receive provisional protection (continued access, status quo, safe fallback).
Article IV: The Right to Remedy & Reversal
“Reversal restores; compensation acknowledges.”
§4.1 Reversal as Default: Upheld appeals result in reversal of the contested decision unless safety criteria explicitly prohibit it.
§4.2 Automatic Compensation: Wrongful harm triggers automatic credits, fee waivers, or restitution without requiring a separate claim.
§4.3 Verified Delivery: Remedy delivery is tracked with timestamps and verified by the affected party.
Article V: The Right to Evidence & Accountability
“If it isn’t logged, it didn’t happen.”
§5.1 Decision Receipts: Every decision emits a receipt with timestamp, owner, and decision object reference.
§5.2 Outcome Transparency: Appeal passage rates and reversal rates are published and used to improve decisions.
§5.3 Audit Trails: Audit trails link decisions to evidence, reviewers, and outcomes for every contested case.