Standard

STD-02 — Contestability & Recourse

The standard defining contestability, review, and remedy obligations for automated decisions.

STANDARD STD-02

Contestability & Recourse

Document ID
STD-02
Version
0.9 (Draft for Review)
Effective Date
January 2026
Authority
The Institute of Ethotechnics

Article I: The Right to Notice & Reasons

“No decision shall be final without specific, actionable reasons.”

  1. §1.1 Decision Objects: Every automated decision must produce a decision object containing reason codes, evidence sources, and scope boundaries.

  2. §1.2 Plain Language: Reasons must be written in language a layperson can understand. Legalese and internal codes are insufficient.

  3. §1.3 Immediate Availability: Reasons must be available at the moment of decision. Deferred explanation is not compliance.

Article II: The Right to an Appeal Path

“The decision surface must include the appeal entry point.”

  1. §2.1 Accessible Intake: The appeal path must be reachable directly from the decision notification or interface.

  2. §2.2 Named Authority: The appeal path must identify the accountable authority with reversal power.

  3. §2.3 Binding Deadlines: Appeal deadlines must be published, time-bound, and enforced.

Article III: The Right to a Review Clock

“Unbounded review is a governance failure.”

  1. §3.1 Declared Maximum: Every review process must declare a maximum duration.

  2. §3.2 Auto-Escalation: When the clock expires without resolution, the case must auto-escalate to a higher authority or default to reversal.

  3. §3.3 Interim Protections: While review is pending, the affected party must receive provisional protection (continued access, status quo, safe fallback).

Article IV: The Right to Remedy & Reversal

“Reversal restores; compensation acknowledges.”

  1. §4.1 Reversal as Default: Upheld appeals result in reversal of the contested decision unless safety criteria explicitly prohibit it.

  2. §4.2 Automatic Compensation: Wrongful harm triggers automatic credits, fee waivers, or restitution without requiring a separate claim.

  3. §4.3 Verified Delivery: Remedy delivery is tracked with timestamps and verified by the affected party.

Article V: The Right to Evidence & Accountability

“If it isn’t logged, it didn’t happen.”

  1. §5.1 Decision Receipts: Every decision emits a receipt with timestamp, owner, and decision object reference.

  2. §5.2 Outcome Transparency: Appeal passage rates and reversal rates are published and used to improve decisions.

  3. §5.3 Audit Trails: Audit trails link decisions to evidence, reviewers, and outcomes for every contested case.

Copy citation (APA/BibTeX)

Cite this page Formats: APA, MLA, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS

Version

Draft

Last updated

Jun 1, 2025

DOI

Pending Zenodo deposit

APA

Ethotechnics Standards Working Group. (2025). STD-02 — Contestability & Recourse. Ethotechnics Institute. https://ethotechnics.org/standards/std-02-contestability-recourse

MLA

Ethotechnics Standards Working Group. "STD-02 — Contestability & Recourse." Ethotechnics Institute, 2025, https://ethotechnics.org/standards/std-02-contestability-recourse.

Chicago

Ethotechnics Standards Working Group. "STD-02 — Contestability & Recourse." Ethotechnics Institute. Jun 1, 2025. https://ethotechnics.org/standards/std-02-contestability-recourse.

BibTeX

@misc{ethotechnics_standards_std_02_contestability_recourse,
  title={STD-02 — Contestability & Recourse},
  author={Ethotechnics Standards Working Group},
  year={2025},
  howpublished={Ethotechnics Institute},
  url={https://ethotechnics.org/standards/std-02-contestability-recourse},
  version={Draft}
}

RIS

TY  - WEB
TI  - STD-02 — Contestability & Recourse
AU  - Ethotechnics Standards Working Group
PY  - 2025
UR  - https://ethotechnics.org/standards/std-02-contestability-recourse
ER  -