Definition
Appeals are judged on merits with transparent criteria, named authority, and documented outcomes — not absorbed into procedural theater. An appeal, whether to the operator's own appeal procedure or to an outside body, is one formal route for a challenge, and appeal integrity is what makes a challenge through that route yield real corrective action and, when upheld, a remedy.
Strong integrity requires publishable decision artifacts, reversible outcomes, and safeguards against retaliatory handling.
Tests that show it is in place
- The share of appeals receiving a decision artifact is tracked and published.
- Appeals include named authority with overturn power rather than advisory review only.
Hypothetical example
- An appeals dashboard shows overturn rate, rationale categories, and median response time by decision class.
References
- Governance taxonomy · Resource
- Worked examples · Essay