What is Contestability?
Contestability ensures people can challenge automated decisions and receive binding review.
Read explainerShort, reusable definitions with examples and next-step artifacts.
Start here
These six cover the core governance capabilities most teams need first.
Contestability ensures people can challenge automated decisions and receive binding review.
Read explainerEthical interrupts are deliberate checkpoints that pause automation when risk thresholds are crossed.
Read explainerRepair logs track remediation actions after harm or errors and tie them to receipts and owners.
Read explainerSafety valves are fallback mechanisms that release pressure when automation risks harm.
Read explainerStoppability explains the right to halt automated processes and protect people from forced tunnels.
Read explainerTime-to-Halt (TTH) defines how quickly an automated system must stop after a halt request.
Read explainerA grant of authority is held for a term against a renewable justification, not owned outright.
Read explainerThe people who absorb a system's errors are the first to see failures and the last able to act, unless standing gives them a route in.
Read explainerEthotechnics does not favor open or closed weights. It classifies a deployment by nine properties and attaches governance to the assembled system, not to the model.
Read explainerTechnical, operational, and institutional reversibility are separate claims, and only the third decides whether a correction will ever be used.
Read explainerEthical interrupts are deliberate checkpoints that pause automation when risk thresholds are crossed.
Read explainerA burden index quantifies the time and effort a system imposes on people.
Read explainerA consent journey maps how consent is requested, renewed, revoked, and recorded over time.
Read explainerThe permission surface is the set of authority grants in force, each with an evidence basis, a scope, a state, and an expiry.
Read explainerRepair logs track remediation actions after harm or errors and tie them to receipts and owners.
Read explainerSafety valves are fallback mechanisms that release pressure when automation risks harm.
Read explainerAn intervention specification replaces human in the loop with six answerable questions about who can actually change the system.
Read explainerContestability ensures people can challenge automated decisions and receive binding review.
Read explainerDesign authority names the accountable owner who can approve, change, or halt a system’s design.
Read explainerInstitutional debris is the record of what people actually did to keep a formal system functioning: workarounds, overrides, tickets, grievances, and exception codes.
Read explainerJustified delegation is a delegation whose authority, evidence, and correction capacity are all still in force today.
Read explainerStoppability explains the right to halt automated processes and protect people from forced tunnels.
Read explainerTime-to-Halt (TTH) defines how quickly an automated system must stop after a halt request.
Read explainerAlso under explainers
The index above is generated from the explainer collection, so these five sit outside it: longer arguments, a checklist, and phrasing to reuse.
Why governance is something an organisation can be more or less able to do, rather than a document it has.
Read explainerWhat has to be remembered, and by whom, for a challenge to still mean something later.
Read explainerThe eight mechanisms that keep contestability real, each anchored to a phase of the remedy lifecycle.
Read explainerA pass/fail screen to run over a decision flow before shipping it or auditing it.
Read explainerCopy-ready phrasing for email, chat, or an intake form when you need a contestable record.
Read explainerSee also: Taxonomy · Standards · Mechanisms