Mechanism MEC-15

Withdrawal rehearsal

Run the workflow without the system on a schedule and measure what withdrawal would cost at the technical, operational, and institutional levels.

  1. 1 Evidence
  2. 2 Authority
  3. 3 Decision
  4. 4 Consequence
  5. 5 Challenge
  6. 6 Reconsideration
  7. 7 Correction acts here

Where it acts

At Correction, one of the seven stages every consequential decision passes through. It runs the work without the system, to show the institution can still stop using it and what that would cost.

Steps

Put the mechanism in motion

3 steps, in order. Check each one off as it is done; the records below show the work was done.

Records this mechanism keeps

What a team running this mechanism keeps, and what each record is for.

Rehearsal plan

Scope, window, participants, and the measures to be taken during the exercise.

Three-level reversibility readout

Cost and time to recover recorded separately for technical, operational, and institutional withdrawal.

Preserved capacity list

The staffing, tooling, and knowledge that must be maintained for withdrawal to stay possible, with owners.

Reuse-ready snippets

Copy policy, audit, and incident language

Use these snippets in requirements, audits, and postmortems with the mechanism permalink.

Policy requirement

Policy requirement (MEC-15 Withdrawal rehearsal)
- Rehearse operating the workflow without the system on a published schedule.
- Record cost, expertise available, and time to recover at the technical, operational, and institutional levels.
Reference: https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/withdrawal-rehearsal

Product requirement

Product requirement (MEC-15)
- The system supports a rehearsal mode that suspends automated handling for a defined scope and window.
- Rehearsal outcomes are recorded against the dependency record for the workflow.

Audit evidence checklist

Audit evidence checklist (MEC-15)
[ ] Rehearsals ran on schedule with a defined scope and window.
[ ] Results state cost, expertise available, and time to recover at all three levels.
[ ] Preserved capacities have named owners and review dates.

Postmortem trigger

Postmortem trigger (MEC-15)
Trigger review when a rehearsal is skipped, or when it shows the workflow can no longer be run without the system.

Example usage

A week of manual triage

One scenario with each part of the mechanism in place.

How it plays out

A claims team runs one region manually for a week each quarter, finds that throughput halves and that only two reviewers still hold the rules, and funds a training rotation as a preserved capacity.

Anti-patterns

Common failure cases and counterfactuals

Each case passes on paper and fails in operation. The counterfactual shows what would have worked.

The switch exists

A documented kill switch is treated as proof of reversibility, though nobody has run the workflow without the system in years.

Counterfactual: Withdrawal is rehearsed on a schedule and the cost of doing it is measured.

Exception: A rehearsal can be scoped to a slice of traffic; what it may not be is hypothetical.

Rehearsal without a record

The drill happens but produces no measurement, so nothing can be compared to last year.

Counterfactual: Each rehearsal records cost, expertise, and recovery time against the dependency record.

Exception: Qualitative findings are useful, but at least one comparable measure has to survive the exercise.

Diagnostics for this mechanism

Tools that size the risk this mechanism addresses.

Diagnostic

Delegation audit

Walks a team through one workflow against six questions and returns an exposure score, the permissions nobody can justify, and whether its decisions can be undone. Start here when the system keeps no decision records yet; use the record conformance checker once it does.

Cite this page · v1.2.1 · updated Oct 6, 2026 · CC BY-SA 4.0

APA

Ethotechnics Institute. (2026). Withdrawal rehearsal (MEC-15). Ethotechnics Institute. https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/withdrawal-rehearsal

MLA

Ethotechnics Institute. "Withdrawal rehearsal (MEC-15)." Ethotechnics Institute, 2026, https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/withdrawal-rehearsal.

Chicago

Ethotechnics Institute. "Withdrawal rehearsal (MEC-15)." Ethotechnics Institute. Oct 6, 2026. https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/withdrawal-rehearsal.

BibTeX

@misc{mechanism_withdrawal-rehearsal,
  title={Withdrawal rehearsal (MEC-15)},
  author={Ethotechnics Institute},
  year={2026},
  howpublished={Ethotechnics Institute},
  url={https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/withdrawal-rehearsal},
  version={v1.2.1}
}

RIS

TY  - WEB
TI  - Withdrawal rehearsal (MEC-15)
AU  - Ethotechnics Institute
PY  - 2026
UR  - https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/withdrawal-rehearsal
ER  -

Authorship

Contact: hello@ethotechnics.org

Publication details

  • Published: Dec 3, 2025
  • Last updated: Oct 6, 2026
  • Version: v1.2.1

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Credit Ethotechnics Institute, include the page title and version, and link to the canonical permalink.

Archive: Wayback Machine history

Latest change

v1.2.1 · Oct 6, 2026 — Rewrote the copy of MEC-01 to MEC-12 in plain sentences. A halt is described as containment while the rule is fixed and people are restored, upheld appeals are counted against the rule in MEC-06 and MEC-08, and MEC-04 is renamed Hard clock.

Earlier versions (3)
  • v1.2.0 · Oct 1, 2026 — Filed every mechanism under the six safeguards, led the starters and role paths with challenges that reach the rule, and added that obligation to MEC-06.
  • v1.1.0 · Jan 9, 2026 — Added citation metadata, mechanisms-level authorship details, and structured usage guidance.
  • v1.0.0 · Dec 3, 2025 — Initial public mechanisms release.