Mechanism MEC-07

Accountability latency tracker

Measure the time from a trigger firing to a named person intervening, halting the system, and restoring the people harmed, so the risk owner sees every missed target.

  1. 1 Evidence
  2. 2 Authority
  3. 3 Decision
  4. 4 Consequence
  5. 5 Challenge
  6. 6 Reconsideration
  7. 7 Correction acts here

Where it acts

At Correction, one of the seven stages every consequential decision passes through. It times how long it takes a named person to intervene, halt the system, and restore the people harmed.

Steps

Put the mechanism in motion

4 steps, in order. Check each one off as it is done; the records below show the work was done.

Records this mechanism keeps

What a team running this mechanism keeps, and what each record is for.

Event definitions

Names and required fields for intervention, halt, and restore records.

Latency report

Latency trends with each missed target marked, prepared for the incident review.

Latency response runbook

Who acts on a missed target, where it escalates, and what they change.

Reuse-ready snippets

Copy policy, audit, and incident language

Use these snippets in requirements, audits, and postmortems with the mechanism permalink.

Policy requirement

Policy requirement (MEC-07 Accountability latency tracker)
- Record intervention, halt, and restore times with the person who acted, the trigger, and the system.
- Publish accountability latency targets in the incident runbook.
Reference: https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/accountability-latency-tracker

Product requirement

Product requirement (MEC-07)
- The monitoring view shows accountability latency next to time to halt.
- Each intervention emits a receipt linked to the repair log and the escalation owner.

Audit evidence checklist

Audit evidence checklist (MEC-07)
[ ] Intervention, halt, and restore events are recorded with timestamps.
[ ] Reports show median and worst-case accountability latency.
[ ] Incident reviews record latency against target and what was changed.
[ ] Missed targets move the grant's state and produce a reconsideration record.

Postmortem trigger

Postmortem trigger (MEC-07)
Trigger review when accountability latency misses a published target, or when the events needed to measure it were not recorded.

Example usage

Tracking override time during a claims surge

One scenario with each part of the mechanism in place.

How it plays out

A car insurer records each time a reviewer overrides an automated claim denial. During a surge of storm-damage claims, median time to override rises from 20 minutes to 6 hours. The miss is logged against the target, the denial grant moves to review_required, and the risk owner adds two reviewers to the night roster.

Anti-patterns

Common failure cases and counterfactuals

Each case passes on paper and fails in operation. The counterfactual shows what would have worked.

Latency tracked without owners

The times are recorded, but no one is named to act when a target is missed.

Counterfactual: Each target names the owner who acts on a miss and where it escalates.

Exception: Two teams can share a target if the record says which one acts first.

Latency without repair links

Missed targets are logged but never tied to a fix, so the same delay comes back.

Counterfactual: Every missed target links to a repair log entry that says what changed.

Exception: A miss caused by a one-time outside event, such as a regional power outage, can close with a recorded reason instead of a fix.

Diagnostics for this mechanism

Tools that size the risk this mechanism addresses.

Diagnostic

Delegation audit

Walks a team through one workflow against six questions and returns an exposure score, the permissions nobody can justify, and whether its decisions can be undone. Start here when the system keeps no decision records yet; use the record conformance checker once it does.

Cite this page · v1.2.1 · updated Oct 6, 2026 · CC BY-SA 4.0

APA

Ethotechnics Institute. (2026). Accountability latency tracker (MEC-07). Ethotechnics Institute. https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/accountability-latency-tracker

MLA

Ethotechnics Institute. "Accountability latency tracker (MEC-07)." Ethotechnics Institute, 2026, https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/accountability-latency-tracker.

Chicago

Ethotechnics Institute. "Accountability latency tracker (MEC-07)." Ethotechnics Institute. Oct 6, 2026. https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/accountability-latency-tracker.

BibTeX

@misc{mechanism_accountability-latency-tracker,
  title={Accountability latency tracker (MEC-07)},
  author={Ethotechnics Institute},
  year={2026},
  howpublished={Ethotechnics Institute},
  url={https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/accountability-latency-tracker},
  version={v1.2.1}
}

RIS

TY  - WEB
TI  - Accountability latency tracker (MEC-07)
AU  - Ethotechnics Institute
PY  - 2026
UR  - https://ethotechnics.org/mechanisms/patterns/accountability-latency-tracker
ER  -

Authorship

Contact: hello@ethotechnics.org

Publication details

  • Published: Dec 3, 2025
  • Last updated: Oct 6, 2026
  • Version: v1.2.1

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Credit Ethotechnics Institute, include the page title and version, and link to the canonical permalink.

Archive: Wayback Machine history

Latest change

v1.2.1 · Oct 6, 2026 — Rewrote the copy of MEC-01 to MEC-12 in plain sentences. A halt is described as containment while the rule is fixed and people are restored, upheld appeals are counted against the rule in MEC-06 and MEC-08, and MEC-04 is renamed Hard clock.

Earlier versions (3)
  • v1.2.0 · Oct 1, 2026 — Filed every mechanism under the six safeguards, led the starters and role paths with challenges that reach the rule, and added that obligation to MEC-06.
  • v1.1.0 · Jan 9, 2026 — Added citation metadata, mechanisms-level authorship details, and structured usage guidance.
  • v1.0.0 · Dec 3, 2025 — Initial public mechanisms release.